BALENCIAGA WINTER 26 巴黎

项目信息

项目品牌: Balenciaga 巴黎世家

项目行业: 服装及鞋履

项目日期: 2026-03-07 10:00 2026-03-07 22:00

项目地点: 巴黎

项目名称: BALENCIAGA Winter 2026「Clairobscur」男女装合并秀

BALENCIAGA(巴黎世家)|BALENCIAGA Winter 2026「Clairobscur」男女装合并秀(巴黎女装周官方日程)|2026-03-07|巴黎

Pierpaolo Piccioli 接手 BALENCIAGA 后的第二场走秀,系列名叫「Clairobscur」——明暗对照。这个名字既是绘画术语,也是这场秀的自我说明:品牌过去那套工业反讽的语汇被收起来,换成一种更情绪化、更接近古典的宏大感。

秀场是男女装合并的。男装先出场,肩线宽阔、外套长到小腿,随后女装接上,用同一套剪裁语言处理更柔软的面料。整场的轮廓都往「建筑」上靠:立领、茧形大衣、收腰的斗篷,衣服像在身体外面搭了一个结构。颜色很少,黑、象牙、深棕,偶尔一段酒红。

BALENCIAGA 1917 年由 Cristóbal Balenciaga 在西班牙创立,1968 年关闭,1986 年重启;Demna 在 2015 至 2025 年间把它做成了潮流符号,Piccioli 2025 年接手,任务是把这个符号重新接回「高级」两个字。这一季是他交出的第二份答卷。

Piccioli 在 Valentino 时期的做法是把高定的工艺带进成衣,这一季他做的是同一件事,但对象换成了 Cristóbal Balenciaga 的档案。外套的肩部用了内置支撑,不用垫肩也能立住;斗篷的下摆加重,走动时不飘;裙子用斜裁,贴身但不紧。这些处理在照片里不显眼,但在现场能看出衣服「有骨架」。

衣服的「重量」是这一季最直接的观感,也是 Piccioli 与前任最清楚的分界线。

面料是另一条线。羊毛、丝绒、以及带细微光泽的丝混纺交替出现,表面有的做了磨砂,有的做了压纹;黑色不是一种黑,而是三四种不同反光率的黑叠在一起。配饰很少,手套与墨镜是主要的点缀,鞋跟高度统一。

空间被压得很暗,只有一道侧光扫过,模特的影子被拉长投在墙上。没有装置,没有屏幕,声音也被压低。这种处理让衣服的体积被放大——在暗处,轮廓比细节更重要,这也是 Piccioli 想要的「明暗对照」。

传播层面,这场秀给的是「雕塑感」的图:立领、长外套、行进的队列。它不依赖明星,也不依赖话题,而是靠衣服本身的重量感。对案例库来说,这是一个「以剪裁替代布景」的样本——空间几乎不参与,制作成本集中在版型与面料上,但画面足够有辨识度。

BALENCIAGA Winter 2026 "Clairobscur" co-ed show 7 March 2026 — Paris Fashion Week official calendar Venue: Paris Agency: LamodeenImages Source: public information published by lamodeenimages.

Pierpaolo Piccioli's second runway for BALENCIAGA was titled Clairobscur — chiaroscuro, light and shadow. The name is a painting term and also a description of the show itself: the house's industrial irony was folded away and replaced by something more emotional, closer to classical grandeur.

The show was co-ed. Menswear came first, with wide shoulders and coats to the calf, then womenswear followed using the same tailoring language on softer fabrics. Every silhouette leaned toward architecture: stand collars, cocoon coats, belted capes, clothes that built a structure outside the body. The palette was narrow — black, ivory, deep brown, one passage of burgundy.

At Valentino, Piccioli's method was to bring couture technique into ready-to-wear, and here he did the same thing with Cristóbal Balenciaga's archive as the source. Shoulders were held by internal structure rather than padding, so they stood without help; cape hems were weighted so they did not fly; skirts were cut on the bias, close but never tight. None of this is obvious in a photograph, and all of it is visible in the room, where the clothes clearly had bones.

Fabric carried the second argument. Wool, velvet and a silk blend with a faint sheen alternated, some surfaces abraded, others embossed; black was not one black but three or four blacks with different reflectivity layered together. Accessories were few — gloves and sunglasses did most of the work, and heel heights were uniform.

The house context matters to how the collection was read. Cristóbal Balenciaga founded the label in Spain in 1917, closed it in 1968, and the name was revived in 1986; Demna turned it into a pop-culture signal between 2015 and 2025, and Piccioli was appointed to reconnect that signal to the idea of couture. This was his second answer to that brief.

Casting followed the same logic: fewer street-cast faces than in the Demna years, more models who could carry a long coat, and a deliberate mix of ages so that the clothes read as a wardrobe rather than a youth statement.

The room was kept very dark, with a single side light sweeping across, so that shadows were thrown long against the wall. No installation, no screens, and the sound was held down. In that darkness, volume mattered more than detail, which is exactly what chiaroscuro is for.

Reaction afterwards focused on the shift rather than on individual pieces: editors described a house that had stopped performing irony and started performing emotion, and questioned whether the customers who arrived for hoodies and platform boots would follow. The commercial answer will come later; the design answer was clear on the runway.

The soundtrack was almost inaudible, which forced the audience to listen to the clothes: heels on the floor, fabric moving, the small sounds of a room paying attention. It was a deliberate inversion of the Demna years, when the music did much of the talking.

For communication, the show produced images of sculpture: stand collars, long coats, a procession rather than a parade. It relied on no celebrity and no talking point, only the weight of the clothes. For a case library it is a sample where tailoring replaces scenery — the space barely participates, the budget sits in pattern and fabric, and the pictures are still unmistakable.

For a house that spent a decade being discussed for its marketing, the most interesting thing here is that the clothes, rather than the marketing, are now the argument.

That is a harder position to defend, and a more interesting one to watch over the next two seasons.

Source: public information from lamodeenimages.



-end-

图片及内容来自网络及品牌公开信息,出处见网络

文字来自 AI 编辑完成,AI信息自我辨识

x 0