FENDI 高定 FW26-27 罗马

项目信息

项目品牌: Fendi 芬迪

项目行业: 服装及鞋履

项目日期: 2026-07-09 10:00 2026-07-09 22:00

项目地点: 罗马

项目名称: FENDI 高定 FW26-27 罗马

FENDI(芬迪)|FENDI Couture Fall Winter 2026-2027 高定系列发布|2026-07-09|罗马

七月九日傍晚,FENDI 的 2026 秋冬高定放在罗马的国家现代与当代美术馆。这是 Maria Grazia Chiuri 回到家乡做的第一场高定,秀没有去巴黎赶高定周的场子,而是把客人请到了罗马。

入口先给了仪式。正立面挂两幅横幅,一幅写系列与日期,另一幅写「After un percorso di lavoro」与 Karl Lagerfeld 的名字;石阶上一路排着蜡烛,中间立一件深色青铜动物雕塑。客人踩着烛光走上来。

内部没有搭台。展厅一间连着一间,石灰华的门框、人字拼的木地板、白色的墙,模特走的就是美术馆自己的地面;观众分坐在展厅两侧的椅子上,视线穿过门洞看下一间。

馆藏直接进了画面。考尔德的动态雕塑悬在头顶,杜布菲的巨幅画占满一墙;模特从画前走过,画的尺寸压过衣服。这是这场秀最大胆的地方:让高定与馆藏同框。

有一间展厅被处理成黑色。墙面、地面与雕塑都是深的,模特走出来时几乎融进背景,只剩面料的反光与刺绣的亮点;再往前一间又回到白光里,明暗的切换就是这场秀的节奏。

灯光压得很低。画作没有额外打亮,追光只跟模特走,衣服是亮的,墙与作品退到半暗;注意力因此始终在人身上。

内容与展陈是同一件事。同一馆内同期重办 1985 年的 FENDI 展览,主题是品牌与工艺的历史;新系列在旧展旁边发布,等于把「时装属于美术馆」说了一遍。这比在巴黎的白色帐篷里办秀更有立场。

传播上,核心图像是「衣服与作品同框」:模特站在画前、雕塑旁、门框里,画面自带权威,不需要额外解释。把秀搬离巴黎高定周放到罗马,本身也是位置的选择——发布同时成了文化新闻。

对案例库来说,这是「以馆藏为布景」的样本:搭建几乎为零,成本在场地、灯光与作品保护;风险也清楚——作品越强,衣服越容易被比下去。它成立,是因为工艺密度撑得住同框。

On the evening of 9 July, FENDI showed its Fall Winter 2026 couture collection at the Galleria Nazionale d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea in Rome. It was Maria Grazia Chiuri's first couture collection for the house, made in her home city, and rather than join the Paris couture calendar the house brought its guests to Rome.

The entrance set the tone. Two banners hung on the museum's facade, one with the collection and its date, the other with the words After un percorso di lavoro and the name of Karl Lagerfeld; candles were laid all the way up the steps, and a dark bronze animal sculpture stood among them. Guests walked up through the candlelight, past a facade dressed for an occasion rather than a brand.

Inside, no runway was built. The galleries run one into the next, with travertine door frames, herringbone oak floors and white walls, and models walked the museum's own floor while guests sat in rows on either side, looking through the doorways into the next room.

The collection entered the picture directly. A Calder mobile hung overhead, a large Dubuffet filled a wall, and as a model passed in front of it the painting's scale overran the clothes, placing the figure inside a frame of reference. That was the most ambitious move of the evening: couture asked to be seen next to art.

One gallery was turned black. Walls, floor and sculpture were all dark, and a model emerging almost dissolved into the background, leaving only the sheen of fabric and the glint of embroidery; the next room returned to white light, and that switch was the rhythm of the show.

Lighting was kept very low. The artworks were not brightened, spotlights followed the models only, so the clothes stayed lit while walls and paintings withdrew into half-dark. The restraint kept attention on the person rather than the set, which is harder to achieve in a museum than in a tent.

Content and display were the same argument. In the same museum a 1985 FENDI exhibition had been restaged, devoted to the house's history and craft; launching a new collection beside an old exhibition amounted to a statement that fashion belongs in a museum. For the brand that carries more weight than another white tent in Paris.

In communication, the core image is clothes and artwork in one frame: a model in front of a painting, beside a sculpture, inside a doorway, the picture carrying its own authority without any need for scenic explanation. Moving the show out of Paris couture week and into Rome was itself a positioning decision, and it turned the launch into cultural news as well as a fashion one.

For a case library this is a study in borrowing a collection as scenery: almost no build, with the budget in the venue, the lighting and the protection of works. The risk is equally clear — the stronger the art, the more easily the clothes are upstaged. It works here because the density of the craft can survive the comparison.

What it leaves is a useful rule for institutional shows: the art should set the scale rather than the subject, and the lighting should make that hierarchy visible without announcing it. In a gallery, the room is already the most expensive thing in the budget, and the job is to avoid competing with it.

Source: public information published by Bureau Betak.



-end-

图片及内容来自网络及品牌公开信息,出处见网络

文字来自 AI 编辑完成,AI信息自我辨识

x 0